How to Spice up Existing Documents
March 9, 2010This post is about My Family, Presentation, Writing. | 2 Comments »
Thanks to Flickr user DianthusMoon for this photo.
In a pleasant turn of events, I had to scramble to get this week’s post together because I was too busy doing actual genealogy to write about it! Consequently, today’s article is going to focus on one of those projects. I’ve spent much time in the past few weeks working on a project my father presented me with: take some memoirs and letters of his grandfather’s, and republish them in a more visually appealing format. You might think that such a project would be simple — I don’t even have to edit the writing! — but you would be underestimating my power to overthink my nerdy undertakings if you said so.
This is the first time I’ve undertaken such a large project. The source material is a measly 27 pages but we will have nigh on 40 before I am done. With this post, I hope to take you through some of the decisions I’ve had to make and the thought processes that have occured so that you may benefit from my labour if you ever decide to take on a similar project. (By the way, it was only after he had me hooked and reeled in for a couple of weeks that my dad mentioned there were two more people in his line he wanted to do this for. The man knows me too well.)
So, without further distraction, let us get on to the considerations I had to, er, consider.
Copyright
Whenever you’re repackaging or altering pre-existing work you need to check on the copyright status and get the okay from the copyright holders, if the work is still covered under such laws.
The Audience
Who is the project for? In this case, relatives who are not terribly genealogically inclined. This means that the text (which is fortunately quite brilliant) needs a bit of visual enhancement. But, being Serious Bizness Capital-G-Genealogists, it has to live up to our exacting standard of source citation, indexing, and so forth as well. Balancing these two aims was harder than you’d think. While we quickly agreed that endnotes were clearly a better choice than footnotes in this project (despite the obvious inefficiencies of the former), we are still embroiled in a debate over whether we should have the narrative flow better by placing the letters after the memoirs in an appendix style, or have it be historically truer by putting them before the memoirs, in chronological order where they “belong”.
The key takeaway point (other than that endnotes are a necessary evil and footnotes are vastly superior in every conceivable way) is that you need to consider who you want to reach with your project, and what their needs are. Make sure your work is tailored to them. I would never condone leaving out sourcing information, so if you are writing for a non-nerdy audience, you will just have to grit your teeth and deal with the dreaded endnotes. None of your family will read them, but the niece or nephew your book gets passed down to may well appreciate all that work when they blossom into the next family historian.
Also, just because you’re writing for a technical audience doesn’t give you free liberty to write boring prose in walls of text. Find and include as many relevant photographs as humanly possible. Maps of the area, pictures of the town (even if not necessarily of their house) or objects they would have owned (to some extent, a 1920s tractor is a 1920s tractor, so as long as you note that it’s not THEIR tractor, everyone’s cool)..pictures really help the less textually oriented among us. They let us really “see” the places and people and times in our mind’s eye. So go find some and include them.
Status of Existing Material
In my case, the scope of the material was chosen for me. My father gathered a couple letters, a short memoir, about half a dozen photographs, and two pieces of paper with the subject signature on them. You might not be so lucky. You could suffer from a relative desert — or, almost worse, a glut — of pre-existing material. If you have too few documents, you will have to do a write-up yourself. If too many, you will have to abridge, edit, leave stuff out, or just have a very long and very expensive project.
We decided to treat the written work as primary source documents: we would introduce it, explain it in endnotes, and add extra photos, but there will be no editing of text, abridging, or creative re-imagining. The words are his grandfather’s; they are not ours to snip and rearrange at our whimsy. Part of the point is to let the subject’s writing skills come through. Messing with the text would be directly contrary to that goal. Consider the length and type of material you have available when making similar decisions for your own project.
Also consider if you have a well-balanced coverage: do you have tons of material surrounding great-grandma’s wedding but almost nothing on the rest of her life? It would be simpler to focus the project explicitly on that life phase instead of trying desperately to not call attention to all the filler material you’ll have to put into the rest of the timeline, then. In our case the ancestor wrote a fair amount about his early life, while touching on his adult years. Our introduction and project focus will reflect that.
Nitpicky Formatting Junk
You’ll need a cover, a new copyright notice, an introduction, maybe a table of contents and probably a name and place index, interleaved explanatory notes as appropriate, and maybe to mess with the formatting a little to help things make a bit more sense. Don’t forget to add all these things in when considering how long the final document is going to be. Our project length grew by a third after accounting for all these “extras” which are easy to overlook.
Finally, the Fun Stuff!
Or not, depending on your artistic inclination. We read the text, talked about what sort of “feel” we wanted for the project…and still haven’t been able to find graphic elements that perfectly suit our needs. Because my skillz with Photoshop are weak and my free time is short, I will be using a pre-existing digital scrapbooking kit with roughly 10+ highly textured papers and minimal use of elements and generic photographs to do my design. While I’ve scoured the internet for The Perfect Kit, we’ve had enthralling discussions about whether the final book should be 8.5 x 11 or 12 x 12, and the relative merits of each. Three-hole binder or bound? Twenty pound paper or glossy heavy stock? Should we get this done at Staples or a print shop? Just how much do we want to spend on this anyway? How many copies do we plan to make, and how durable do we want them to be? Are we going to add to this later, or is this a one-time, finito, kind of project?
I believe it’s important to consider the practical aspects of the end project so that you don’t get caught up going down the wrong path with the graphic design. Knowing our budget restrictions meant that I shied away from kits with very dark colours, as they would be ink-intensive. We still haven’t chosen paper, but I’ve tasked my father with looking into that as this baby is his project and he will be the one paying to have it printed. I suspect it may be cheaper in the end to have a print shop do it, but we’ll have to get some price quotes and see.
Just Do It
With that whirlwind overview, I’m going to follow my own advice and head off to search for more layouts and debate some more minutiae. If you have ever compiled existing family history material in a highly visual manner, or just had to get creative when re-presenting prior work, I would love to hear about it in the comments.



No, no, not the genealogy of pets, but the pets in your genealogy. Most animal lovers will instantly grasp some of the possibilities inherent with this approach, but let’s take a moment to go over them anyway. Thinking about the animals in our ancestors’ lives is not part of our standard consideration when we do our research. But looking at this aspect, when applicable, not only helps to flesh them out more, it simply makes them more human. It’s also a handy exercise in using less common records, or extracting info from common records in ways you wouldn’t normally do.
Few things rival my passion for genealogy, but cooking and eating good food is one of them. What better way to spend a day than marrying the two into one delicious, history-rich extravaganza? Today’s article is going to focus on sharing a family recipe — not a cookbook, mind you, as that might be overwhelming to any perfectionists in the crowd *shifty eyes*, but just one recipe. Besides, the process is repeatable to create a cookbook if that’s what you want to eventually do.
When you interview your family, sooner or later you will encounter a pretty tall tale. The novice researcher gets excited at the possibility of belonging to an exotic ethnicity; the more jaded historian dismisses the stories of war-time heroics out of hand. Neither approach is particularly constructive. In this article, we’re going to walk through how to prove (or disprove) a family legend.
I was in the midst of seeking out cool genealogy project ideas when I stumbled across digital scrapbooking. Those of you who are familiar with “regular” scrapbooking will probably have some idea as to what “digital scrapbooking” could mean. Those of you who think a scrapbook is a bunch of yellowed photos crammed into those plastic peel-back pages are about to have your minds blown…
Katrina McQuarrie is a Gen Y genealogist who believes in making genealogy more accessible to non-nerds and young people. If you want to get free articles on how to improve your mad genealogy skillz,